Full Freedom of Movement Implementation Uncertain

Last Friday, leaders from the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) met virtually to discuss implementing the Freedom of Movement protocols.

These protocols are considered a vital part of the CARICOM Single Market and Economy (CSME).

However, the meeting ended without a clear consensus on a date for the protocols’ implementation, which raised some concerns.

Earlier, the Heads of Government had set March 31, 2024, as the deadline for the full implementation of the Freedom of Movement. Despite this, Antigua and Barbuda has expressed its intention not to implement the final step of the freedom of movement at this time.

Instead, the country plans to maintain the current Skills Certificate regime that has been in place for several years.

This decision has generated much discussion throughout CARICOM, particularly because Antigua and Barbuda has been more welcoming of CARICOM nationals within its borders compared to other jurisdictions in the community.

Prime Minister Gaston Browne has explained that it is not feasible for Antigua and Barbuda to move to full freedom of movement at this time.

This would lead to undue strain on the country’s overburdened social services, such as schools and health care.

Dr. Clarence Henry, Antigua and Barbuda’s Ambassador to CARICOM, provided insights into Friday’s meeting. He stated that some countries, notably Jamaica, had raised a number of concerns. Other nations shared additional concerns and requested certain clarifications.

For now, Antigua and Barbuda will continue to honor the Skills Certificate regime, which allows twelve categories of Caribbean workers to travel freely in the region and be gainfully employed. The country plans to implement Freedom of Movement when it deems it appropriate fully.

“Some countries expressed support for the protocols, while others had niggling inquiries that they wanted resolving . They requested extra time to have their concerns recorded and clarified ahead of another meeting set for Saturday March 23, where a final decision on whether the March 31 implementation date remains feasible or if a new date would be required,” he stated.