Defence lawyer Calls Out DPP for Public Tirade

Defence attorney Andrew O’Kola has called for a public apology from Director of Public Prosecutions Clement Joseph following a heated confrontation in the High Court hallway last Friday in the presence of many.

Addressing the 24 October incident, O’Kola said he was “publicly and unjustifiably verbally attacked by the Director of Public Prosecutions, in the presence of court personnel, members of the media, and members of the public.”

“Prior to this encounter I at all times conducted myself lawfully and professionally in the discharge of my duties as Counsel, and I utterly reject the manner and tone of the public outburst directed at me,” O’Kola stated.

The incident occurred as O’Kola was walking through the hallway whilst Joseph was seated nearby. The DPP mentioned to O’Kola a letter he had written to him, saying he was “doing too much” and dismissing it as “BS” before launching into a loud tirade.

O’Kola responded that he was simply doing his job, but Joseph continued his verbal attack, raising his voice and drawing the attention of more onlookers in the courthouse.

In his statement, O’Kola said: “It is deeply regrettable that this incident happened in a public space. Naturally, the incident has understandably caused some amount of disquiet and rightly so as the public expects that the administration of justice be conducted with mutual respect, dignity, and decorum.”

The attorney emphasized his professional obligations, stating: “As an Officer of the Court, I remain steadfast in my duty to fearlessly represent my clients within the bounds of the law, and by all proper means, as is my sworn professional obligation. A Barrister-at-law has a duty to fiercely defend his client while upholding the integrity of the justice system.”

He explained that vigorous advocacy “is indispensable to ensuring that all evidence is properly tested, that the innocent are protected from wrongful or malicious prosecution, and that the justice process is not compromised.”

O’Kola concluded: “In light of the nature and circumstances of the encounter I endured, I believe that a public apology is warranted. Nevertheless, I reaffirm my commitment to the rule of law and to the fearless and independent performance of my professional duties in the service of justice. I am not asking for favours, I am just doing my job.”