Government rejects Misleading and Inaccurate claims regarding Antigua and Barbuda’s relationship with the USA

PRESS RELEASE

The Government of Antigua and Barbuda strongly rejects the misleading and inaccurate claims recently circulated regarding the nation’s relationship with the United States, the status of the West Indies Oil Company (WIOC), and the operation of the Citizenship by Investment (CBI) Programme.

The commentary in question presents conjecture as fact and creates a distorted picture of Antigua and Barbuda’s policies and international engagements. Several of the claims are demonstrably false.

1.⁠ ⁠U.S.–Antigua and Barbuda Relations

The assertion that relations with the United States are “under extreme strain” is incorrect. Both governments remain in regular communication, including at senior diplomatic and technical levels. Where policy adjustments occur—such as changes to visa procedures—they are part of wider U.S. global measures and not targeted actions against Antigua and Barbuda.

Any suggestion that Antigua and Barbuda is being singled out or punished is unfounded.

2.⁠ ⁠West Indies Oil Company (WIOC)

Claims that WIOC is the subject of U.S. pressure or that its operations are in jeopardy due to its shareholding structure are inaccurate. The Government has been fully transparent regarding WIOC’s ownership for many years and continues to operate within all applicable international legal frameworks, including those relating to entities under sanctions.

There has been no request—public, private, direct, or indirect—from the United States for Antigua and Barbuda to seize, expropriate, or forcibly transfer any shareholding in WIOC. In addition, WIOC has been doing business with United States entities without restrictions over the past seven years.

3.⁠ ⁠Citizenship by Investment Programme

The allegations that the CBI programme is being used by “adversaries” to circumvent security systems are speculative and irresponsible. Antigua and Barbuda maintains one of the most rigorous due-diligence regimes in the region, including multi-layered vetting, international security checks, and continuous review of procedures in cooperation with trusted global partners.

There is no evidence whatsoever that the programme presents the type of security risks claimed by the commentator.

4.⁠ ⁠Use of False or Invented Information

The narrative presented is heavily coloured by personal bias and includes several statements that have no basis in fact. The public should treat such material with caution, particularly when it attempts to manufacture tension or portray routine governmental processes as evidence of crisis.

Conclusion

Antigua and Barbuda remains committed to responsible governance, respect for international law, and constructive diplomacy with all partners, including the United States.
Attempts to portray the country as isolated, pressured, or non-compliant are inaccurate and misleading.

The Government will continue to correct misinformation wherever it arises to ensure that the public, investors, and international partners receive accurate and verifiable information. (Ends)