She described CAP as a standardized mechanism for structuring and distributing official alerts through radio, television, websites, mobile services, social media and other communication channels.

However, Lang emphasized that CAP is not the entire warning system. She said it must work alongside impact-based forecasting, which helps authorities communicate how an expected hazard could affect particular communities and sectors.

Lang encouraged participants to consider the information required by different sectors, the potential impacts that must be communicated, the thresholds that should trigger action and the steps necessary to make warnings more consistent, timely and useful.

She also stressed that strong relationships and effective coordination among agencies are essential to the success of any early-warning system.

“The success of an early-warning system should not be measured by the number of warnings issued, but by whether those warnings enable earlier and better decisions that protect lives, livelihoods and communities,” Lang said.

Andrew Tupper, Chief of Early Warning Services at the World Meteorological Organization, also addressed the participants.

Tupper said effective warning systems remain critical for Caribbean countries, which face hazards including tropical cyclones, heavy rainfall, flooding, storm surges, volcanic activity and landslides.

He cautioned that accurate weather forecasts are only one part of protecting the public.

“Forecasts alone do not save lives,” Tupper said.

He explained that an effective system must cover the entire warning cycle—from understanding disaster risks and detecting hazards to issuing authoritative alerts and ensuring that individuals and institutions are prepared to act.

Tupper described CAP as a bridge connecting the agencies and stakeholders involved in that process. He said the system allows official warnings to be distributed rapidly and consistently across several platforms.

He also linked the protocol to the United Nations’ Early Warnings for All initiative, which seeks to ensure that everyone is protected by effective multi-hazard early-warning systems.

Participants were encouraged to use the training to strengthen their technical skills, clarify the responsibilities of their respective institutions and establish practical arrangements for issuing and distributing emergency alerts.

The workshop included discussions, practical exercises and knowledge-sharing sessions. Facilitators provided hands-on guidance in creating, structuring and distributing emergency alerts using CAP.

The exercises also reinforced the importance of accurate information, clearly defined responsibilities and close cooperation among agencies during emergencies.

Certificates were presented to participants at the conclusion of the programme in recognition of their commitment to strengthening disaster preparedness and public-warning capabilities.

Participants also shared their experiences and lessons from the workshop. One attendee admitted being initially reluctant to participate but said the training provided a much deeper understanding of CAP and left them with “no regrets” about attending.

The reflections highlighted the practical value of the programme and the need for continued capacity-building among the agencies responsible for disaster preparedness, emergency response and public communication.