A bloated budget? or necessary expenses?

Dear Editor

I have recently come across the budget proposed by the Antigua and Barbuda Pan Association for this year’s Panorama competition.

I have some concerns about the allocation of funds, particularly regarding the expenditure of over $30,000 to recruit 12 overseas specialist players, including covering their airfares, accommodation, and stipends.

In the current financial climate, where resources are limited, I believe that the Pan Association’s request for $400,000 seems excessive.

It seems that the Festivals Commission made a genuine effort to support the Pan Association by offering $330,000 in addition to providing numerous tickets for them to sell.

From my point of view, this offer essentially met the Pan Association’s original request of $400,000.

I think the Pan Association should have seriously considered this reasonable offer, especially if they genuinely care about the Carnival and the well-being of Antigua and Barbuda.

By rejecting the offer, the Pan Association may have underestimated the government’s commitment to supporting the festival. It’s important to remember that while Panorama is a significant part of the carnival, the overall festival will go on without it.

I felt compelled to express these concerns because I believe that open communication and collaboration can lead to a better allocation of resources for the benefit of all involved.