Wendel Alexander and Angela Mejia
The recent announcement that attorney Wendel has agreed to represent Angela Mejia has stirred public debate, with opinions divided on whether his decision is admirable or misguided.
On one hand, some view Wendel’s move as a principled commitment to justice and due process. Every individual, no matter how controversial or unpopular, has the right to legal representation.
By taking up Mejia’s case, Wendel reinforces the cornerstone of our legal system: that the accused are presumed innocent until proven guilty, and that they deserve a fair defense. His decision could be seen as a reminder that justice must never be swayed by emotion, gossip, or public pressure.
On the other hand, critics argue that representation carries moral weight, especially when the allegations at hand deeply wound the conscience of the community. To them, Wendel’s choice risks appearing as an endorsement, or at the very least, a softening of the seriousness of Mejia’s alleged actions.
In a small society where reputations matter greatly, some feel this could damage public trust not only in Wendel himself but also in the broader pursuit of accountability.
Ultimately, this controversy reflects a larger tension we all grapple with: balancing our moral instincts with the principles of law and fairness.
We may not agree with whom Wendel chooses to represent, but we cannot ignore that his decision forces us to confront the uncomfortable truth that justice often requires defending those we might otherwise condemn.
Concerned Citizen
It’s not that people against the good gentleman representation of this young lady it’s the nature of which the crime was committed and the attention it got from the public likewise the government, with all this said education of the law is not commonly found among us and by this it’s deemed essential to jus throw the keys away or end her life but NO that’s not how it goes and she has to found guilty of the crime by way of presenting evidence by the prosecutors ( by law ) and not the country….. I see nothing wrong with what the lawyer is doing ….# Innocent until proven guilty..
Justice for Chantal Crump!!!
Bring back the death penalty!!!
He coulda say no. Not every dollar worth it. Some cases stain your name foreve
Every man and woman deserve a lawyer. That’s how justice works. Wendel just doing he job, nothing more, nothing less
Me fed up with these big lawyers acting like saints. Justice slow, but God nah sleep
Inna small place like Antigua, you can’t separate morals from law so easy. Wendel might be right in theory, but the optics bad bad
Wendell is by far one of the best defense lawyers on island and I admire him immensely; however, the nature of the crime has me in my feelings because I don’t think the accused deserves his caliber of counsel and I am terrified that she will walk as a result of it. Yes, everyone deserves their day in court, but I am quite conflicted on this one ya.
Why he put himself in this? He might win legally but lose socially. Sometimes you have to think about reputation too
Hmmmmmm interesting prospective
If it was your family she hurt, you would not talk about ‘fair trial.’ Stop defending wrongdoers
This is why the justice system exists to test evidence in court, not in the streets or on social media. In the end, the issue isn’t who represents Mejia, but whether the system can deliver justice all can respect.