Prime Minister Gaston Browne has called on Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Clement Joseph to provide greater clarity on controversial prosecutorial decisions, warning that a lack of public explanation could weaken confidence in Antigua and Barbuda’s justice system.

Speaking on his weekly Browne and Browne programme on Pointe FM, Browne stressed that while the DPP operates independently under the Constitution, the office also carries a responsibility to maintain public trust through appropriate levels of accountability.

The Prime Minister’s remarks follow recent public debate surrounding the discontinuation of drug-related charges in two separate cases, including one involving a Jamaican national and another concerning a Canadian woman reportedly suffering from a terminal illness who had been convicted in connection with a significant drug importation matter.

Browne said that although he fully respects the constitutional independence of the DPP, decisions that attract widespread public attention should be accompanied by sufficient explanation to ease concerns and reduce speculation.

“When decisions generate public concern, there should be some effort to provide context so that citizens can understand the basis on which those decisions were made,” Browne said.

He suggested that media reports may have inaccurately portrayed comments attributed to Joseph indicating that the DPP owed no explanation to the public. Browne said he was prepared to give Joseph the benefit of the doubt, noting that the comments could have been taken out of context.

However, he maintained that public officials, regardless of the independence of their offices, must remain mindful of public perception and confidence in the institutions they serve.

The Prime Minister pointed to his own regular appearances on radio as an example of accountability in public office, saying elected officials have a duty to explain their actions and decisions to the people they serve.

Referring specifically to the case involving the Canadian inmate, Browne noted that there are established legal mechanisms for addressing compassionate circumstances, including sentence commutations that involve recommendations from prison authorities, legal officials and ultimately the Governor General.

He questioned whether decisions involving serious narcotics offences should rest solely on the discretion of one office-holder, arguing that such matters can attract scrutiny both locally and internationally.

While emphasising that he was not accusing the DPP of wrongdoing, Browne described Joseph as a man of integrity but cautioned that unexplained decisions can create perceptions that damage confidence in the justice system.

According to Browne, the consequences of such perceptions extend beyond the DPP’s office and can affect the reputation of Antigua and Barbuda among international partners, particularly countries closely monitoring efforts to combat drug trafficking.

He also noted that controversial legal decisions often lead to speculation involving senior government officials, including the Prime Minister and Attorney General, even when they have no involvement in the prosecutorial process.

Browne said greater transparency, while respecting legal and privacy considerations, would help protect both the credibility of the DPP’s office and public confidence in the administration of justice.

The Prime Minister concluded by reaffirming his support for the DPP’s constitutional independence but stressed that accountability and public trust must remain central to the functioning of the country’s justice system.